Manitowoc vs SPX Technologies
MTW and SPXC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTW and SPXC compare
SPX Technologies is the larger company, worth 9.6 times as much as Manitowoc ($8.0B against $831M).
On earnings, SPX Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 28.8× trailing earnings, against 41.9× for Manitowoc.
SPX Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 8.9% for Manitowoc).
SPX Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 0.87% at Manitowoc.
SPX Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for Manitowoc), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTW | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $831M | $8.0B |
| Share price | $23.03 | $159.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 106% | −20.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 3.8% | 141% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.41 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 4,700 | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.9× | 28.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 15.9× |
| P/FCF | 12.0× (better) | 26.4× |
| FCF yield | 8.4% (better) | 3.8% |
| Fair value | $20.45 | $194.47 |
| Margin of safety | −12.6% | 17.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.9% | 20.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.2% | 15.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −55.0% | 32.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −53.8% | 24.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.7% | 40.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.1% | 16.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.87% | 11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 12.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.9% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.2% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | 0.26 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.81 | 0.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.11 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.30 | 4.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.9% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 5.6% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$106K (better) | −$19.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- MTW stock overview
- MTW income statement
- MTW valuation and score
- SPXC stock overview
- SPXC income statement
- SPXC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.