Vail Resorts vs Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality
MTN and PRSU side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTN and PRSU compare
Vail Resorts is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality ($5.5B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality is cheaper: it trades at 33.2× trailing earnings, against 37.5× for Vail Resorts.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus −4.3% for Vail Resorts).
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 5.2% at Vail Resorts.
Vail Resorts pays a dividend yielding 5.8%; Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality does not pay one.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Vail Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTN | PRSU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $154.43 | $55.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.7% | 64.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.9% | 16.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 40K | 2,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 37.5× | 33.2× (better) |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 22.9× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.0× | 12.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.2× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.37 |
| FCF yield | 4.5% (better) | −1.4% |
| Fair value | $142.96 | $64.25 |
| Margin of safety | −8.0% | 13.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.3% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −47.3% (better) | −87.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% (better) | −87.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.6% |
| Operating margin | 14.8% | – |
| Net margin | 5.2% | 9.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.7% (better) | −4.4% |
| Return on equity | 44.4% (better) | 7.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 13.25 | 0.21 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.02 | 0.51 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 1.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.52 | 4.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.8% | – |
| Payout ratio | 215% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.82% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 130% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 11.0% | 26.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $5.0M (better) | $0 |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.2% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- MTN stock overview
- MTN income statement
- MTN valuation and score
- PRSU stock overview
- PRSU income statement
- PRSU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.