MGIC Investment vs Octave Specialty
MTG and OSG side by side, both in insurance carriers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTG and OSG compare
MGIC Investment is the larger company, worth 24 times as much as Octave Specialty ($5.7B against $241M).
Octave Specialty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.0% versus −2.2% for MGIC Investment).
MGIC Investment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 58.1% compared with −17.7% at Octave Specialty.
MGIC Investment pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Octave Specialty does not pay one.
MGIC Investment scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Octave Specialty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTG | OSG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.7B | $241M |
| Share price | $27.77 | $5.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.5% | −46.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 85.4% | −67.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.71 |
| Employees | – | 275 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.6× | – |
| P/S | 4.8× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.0× | – |
| PEG | 2.15 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.4% | – |
| Fair value | $31.42 | – |
| Margin of safety | 11.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.2% | 36.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.24% | 10.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −8.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 58.1% (better) | −17.7% |
| FCF margin | 59.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 13.8% (better) | −7.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 3.13 (better) | 0.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 19.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 14.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.8% | 66.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 6.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$27.3M | $91.1K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- MTG stock overview
- MTG income statement
- MTG valuation and score
- OSG stock overview
- OSG income statement
- OSG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.