StockData

Mingteng International vs WF International

MTEN and WXM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MTEN and WXM compare

Mingteng International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus −13.7% for WF International).

Mingteng International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −15.3% compared with −24.5% at WF International.

Mingteng International scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for WF International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMTENWXM
Size and price
Share price$0.350$2.68
Change, 1 year−99.9%−54.6%
Beta (5Y)2.522.02
Employees3128
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)15.3% (better)−13.7%
Net income growth (TTM)–−442%
EPS growth (TTM)–−394%
Profitability
Gross margin22.5% (better)8.8%
Operating margin−3.6% (better)−21.4%
Net margin−15.3% (better)−24.5%
FCF margin−9.5%–
Return on equity−11.7% (better)−66.8%
Return on invested capital−2.5% (better)−93.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.11 (better)
Interest coverage−10.9×–
Current ratio1.191.31 (better)
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Ownership
Held by insiders27.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$380K–
Short interest, % of float1.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.