Maris Tech vs UTStarcom
MTEK and UTSI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTEK and UTSI compare
UTStarcom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−17.5% versus −77.9% for Maris Tech).
UTStarcom scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Maris Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTEK | UTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.282 | $1.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −78.5% | −21.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 2718% | −58.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 12 | 238 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −77.9% | −17.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% (better) | −18.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −27.1% | 11.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −390% | −95.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −403% | – |
| FCF margin | −256% | −103% (better) |
| Return on equity | −162% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −148% (better) | −432% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.63 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.69 | 2.86 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 49.9% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$82.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.02% |
Go deeper
- MTEK stock overview
- MTEK income statement
- MTEK valuation and score
- UTSI stock overview
- UTSI income statement
- UTSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.