Matador Resources vs Murphy Oil
MTDR and MUR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTDR and MUR compare
Matador Resources is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Murphy Oil ($7.5B against $6.3B).
On earnings, Matador Resources is cheaper: it trades at 10.4× trailing earnings, against 21.8× for Murphy Oil.
Murphy Oil grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus −3.6% for Matador Resources).
Matador Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.9% compared with 9.8% at Murphy Oil.
Both pay dividends: Matador Resources yields 2.5% and Murphy Oil 3.1%.
Matador Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Murphy Oil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTDR | MUR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.5B | $6.3B |
| Share price | $60.88 | $43.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.4% | 57.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.4% | 52.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 483 | 822 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.4× (better) | 21.8× |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3× (better) | 4.7× |
| Fair value | $77.63 | $50.01 |
| Margin of safety | 21.6% (better) | 12.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 33.8% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −15.2% | 3.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.5% | 4.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 32.2% (better) | 18.6% |
| Net margin | 19.9% (better) | 9.8% |
| Return on equity | 12.8% (better) | 5.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.8% (better) | 6.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.29 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.67 |
| Interest coverage | 5.4× | 5.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.65 | 0.85 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.49 | 2.16 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 24.6% | 65.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.31% (better) | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.1% | 88.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 4.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.7M (better) | −$1.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.1% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
- MUR stock overview
- MUR income statement
- MUR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.