Maison Solutions vs Village Super Market
MSS and VLGEA side by side, both in consumer staples. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSS and VLGEA compare
Village Super Market is the larger company, worth 23 times as much as Maison Solutions ($627M against $27.8M).
Maison Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus 3.7% for Village Super Market).
Village Super Market keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.2% compared with −10.1% at Maison Solutions.
Village Super Market pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Maison Solutions does not pay one.
Village Super Market scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 2 for Maison Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSS | VLGEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.8M | $627M |
| Share price | $0.912 | $42.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −96.3% | 25.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 94.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 378 | 7,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | 3.6× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.8% |
| Fair value | – | $58.88 |
| Margin of safety | – | 28.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.2% (better) | 3.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −7.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.1% | 28.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −8.0% | 2.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.1% | 2.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 2.3% |
| Return on equity | −122% | 10.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −72.8% | 11.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.76 |
| Interest coverage | −3.8× | 19.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 1.14 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.11 | 3.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.16% | 48.4% |
| Held by insiders | – | 27.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$227K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- MSS stock overview
- MSS income statement
- MSS valuation and score
- VLGEA stock overview
- VLGEA income statement
- VLGEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.