StockData

Motorsport Games vs Snail

MSGM and SNAL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MSGM and SNAL compare

Motorsport Games and Snail are about the same size, with market caps of $20.0M and $20.6M.

Motorsport Games grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (78.6% versus −5.6% for Snail).

Motorsport Games keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.2% compared with −11.2% at Snail.

Motorsport Games scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 2 for Snail), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMSGMSNAL
Size and price
Market cap$20.0M$20.6M
Share price$4.35$2.30
Change, 1 year26.8%−54.7%
Change, 5 years−95.6%–
Beta (5Y)1.122.39
Employees32166
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)2
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E10.1×–
P/S1.4×0.2× (better)
P/B5.1×–
EV/EBITDA4.8×–
Fair value$9.40–
Margin of safety53.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)78.6% (better)−5.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−9.9%–
Net income growth (TTM)11.4%–
EPS growth (TTM)187%–
Profitability
Gross margin83.9% (better)33.7%
Operating margin21.1% (better)−13.9%
Net margin16.2% (better)−11.2%
Return on equity53.9%–
Return on invested capital203%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage152× (better)−15.6×
Current ratio1.85 (better)0.55
Altman Z-score−6.01−0.55 (better)
Piotroski F-score7 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.6M–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.