MSG Knickerbockers vs Onespaworld
MSGK and OSW side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGK and OSW compare
MSG Knickerbockers is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Onespaworld ($7.8B against $3.1B).
MSG Knickerbockers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.1% versus 9.8% for Onespaworld).
Onespaworld keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.3% compared with −1.3% at MSG Knickerbockers.
Both pay dividends: MSG Knickerbockers yields 2.2% and Onespaworld 0.64%.
Onespaworld scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 2 for MSG Knickerbockers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGK | OSW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $322.56 | $31.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.8% | 43.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 80.5% | 185% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 522 | 5,395 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 37.4× |
| P/S | 6.7× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 236× | 26.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 33.4× |
| PEG | – | 3.09 |
| FCF yield | −0.00% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $34.68 | $21.26 |
| Margin of safety | −830% | −47.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.1% (better) | 9.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.6% | 51.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 14.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 18.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 2.7% | 9.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.3% | 8.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.03% | 9.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 15.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 14.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.12 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.60 | 0.32 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 18.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.44 | 2.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 14.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.64% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 2.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 41.2% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1M (better) | −$14.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.5% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- MSGK stock overview
- MSGK income statement
- MSGK valuation and score
- OSW stock overview
- OSW income statement
- OSW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.