Madison Square Garden Entertainment vs StubHub
MSGE and STUB side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGE and STUB compare
Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as StubHub ($3.8B against $2.0B).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus 7.9% for StubHub).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.6% compared with −91.3% at StubHub.
StubHub scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Madison Square Garden Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGE | STUB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $79.49 | $5.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.7% | −72.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.49 |
| Employees | 1,060 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.2× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 316× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.4× | – |
| P/FCF | – | 3.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 31.2% |
| Fair value | $59.47 | $10.26 |
| Margin of safety | −33.7% | 48.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 66.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 176% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 190% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 82.1% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | −69.7% |
| Net margin | 8.6% (better) | −91.3% |
| FCF margin | – | 32.7% |
| Return on equity | – | −141% |
| Return on invested capital | 31.9% (better) | −60.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 47.30 | 0.86 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.56 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× (better) | −14.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.62 | 1.04 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.15 (better) | −0.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.66% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.66% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 74.5% |
| Held by insiders | 18.9% | 49.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$11.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- MSGE stock overview
- MSGE income statement
- MSGE valuation and score
- STUB stock overview
- STUB income statement
- STUB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.