Madison Square Garden Entertainment vs Vivid Seats
MSGE and SEAT side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGE and SEAT compare
Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the larger company, worth 241 times as much as Vivid Seats ($3.8B against $15.6M).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus −23.4% for Vivid Seats).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Vivid Seats), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGE | SEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $15.6M |
| Share price | $79.49 | $1.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.7% | −85.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.39 |
| Employees | 1,060 | 565 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.2× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 316× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.4× | – |
| FCF yield | – | −451% |
| Fair value | $59.47 | $57.43 |
| Margin of safety | −33.7% | 97.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | −23.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 66.9% | 80.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 176% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 190% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 16.2% | – |
| Net margin | 8.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −17.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 31.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 47.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.56 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.62 (better) | 0.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.15 (better) | −3.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.66% (better) | 0.02% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.66% (better) | 0.02% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 80.3% |
| Held by insiders | 18.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | −$2.5K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | – |
Go deeper
- MSGE stock overview
- MSGE income statement
- MSGE valuation and score
- SEAT stock overview
- SEAT income statement
- SEAT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.