Madison Square Garden Entertainment vs United Parks & Resorts
MSGE and PRKS side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGE and PRKS compare
Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as United Parks & Resorts ($3.8B against $1.8B).
On earnings, United Parks & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 15.0× trailing earnings, against 39.2× for Madison Square Garden Entertainment.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus −1.9% for United Parks & Resorts).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.6% compared with 7.6% at United Parks & Resorts.
United Parks & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Madison Square Garden Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGE | PRKS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $1.8B |
| Share price | $79.49 | $40.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.7% | 19.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −39.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 1,060 | 3,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.2× | 15.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 316× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.4× | 8.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 12.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.3% |
| Fair value | $59.47 | $62.61 |
| Margin of safety | −33.7% | 36.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | −1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 66.9% (better) | 30.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 176% (better) | −31.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 190% (better) | −18.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 16.2% | 18.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.6% (better) | 7.6% |
| FCF margin | – | 9.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 31.9% (better) | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 47.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.56 (better) | 4.59 |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× (better) | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.62 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.15 (better) | 1.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.66% | 20.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.66% | 20.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 134% |
| Held by insiders | 18.9% | 63.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | −$881K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 30.2% |
Go deeper
- MSGE stock overview
- MSGE income statement
- MSGE valuation and score
- PRKS stock overview
- PRKS income statement
- PRKS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.