Madison Square Garden Entertainment vs Madison Square Garden Sports
MSGE and MSGS side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGE and MSGS compare
Madison Square Garden Sports is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Madison Square Garden Entertainment ($9.4B against $3.8B).
On earnings, Madison Square Garden Entertainment is cheaper: it trades at 58.2× trailing earnings, against 1214× for Madison Square Garden Sports.
Madison Square Garden Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.5% versus 11.0% for Madison Square Garden Sports).
Madison Square Garden Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.2% compared with 0.67% at Madison Square Garden Sports.
Madison Square Garden Sports pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Madison Square Garden Entertainment does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGE | MSGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $9.4B |
| Share price | $80.35 | $388.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 81.4% | 72.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 105% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 1,060 | 522 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 58.2× (better) | 1214× |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 8.1× |
| P/B | 83.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.6× (better) | 295× |
| P/FCF | – | 153× |
| FCF yield | – | 0.65% |
| Fair value | $47.75 | $27.32 |
| Margin of safety | −68.3% (better) | −1323% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.5% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 66.9% (better) | 22.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 76.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 79.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Net margin | 6.2% (better) | 0.67% |
| FCF margin | – | 5.3% |
| Return on equity | 408% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 25.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 12.47 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.40 (better) | 2.93 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× (better) | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.70 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.01 | 3.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 6.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 0.66% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.66% | 1.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 76.6% |
| Held by insiders | 18.8% | 41.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$2.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- MSGE stock overview
- MSGE income statement
- MSGE valuation and score
- MSGS stock overview
- MSGS income statement
- MSGS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.