Marex vs Tradeweb Markets
MRX and TW side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRX and TW compare
Marex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.9% versus 14.4% for Tradeweb Markets).
Tradeweb Markets keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 39.8% compared with 14.5% at Marex.
Tradeweb Markets pays a dividend yielding 0.44%; Marex does not pay one.
Tradeweb Markets scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Marex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRX | TW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $28.7B |
| Share price | $64.41 | $122.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 109% | 16.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 29.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 3,109 | 1,569 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.8× |
| P/S | – | 12.6× |
| P/B | – | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 21.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 24.8× |
| PEG | – | 0.78 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.0% |
| Fair value | – | $131.06 |
| Margin of safety | – | 6.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.9% (better) | 14.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 18.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 43.6% | 44.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 41.9% | 45.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 33.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 44.1% |
| Net margin | 14.5% | 39.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 32.3% | 50.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 28.7% (better) | 14.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.17 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 490× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | – |
| Altman Z-score | – | 16.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.44% |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.6% | 50.0% |
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | 51.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.9M (better) | −$44.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- MRX stock overview
- MRX income statement
- MRX valuation and score
- TW stock overview
- TW income statement
- TW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.