Marex vs Nasdaq
MRX and NDAQ side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRX and NDAQ compare
Marex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.9% versus 11.5% for Nasdaq).
Nasdaq keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.8% compared with 14.5% at Marex.
Nasdaq pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Marex does not pay one.
Nasdaq scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Marex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRX | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $60.2B |
| Share price | $70.72 | $108.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 103% | 22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 56.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 3,109 | 9,525 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.6× |
| P/S | – | 6.6× |
| P/B | – | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 23.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 26.7× |
| PEG | – | 2.70 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.8% |
| Fair value | – | $85.93 |
| Margin of safety | – | −26.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.9% (better) | 11.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 8.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 43.6% (better) | 28.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 41.9% (better) | 30.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | – | 29.8% |
| Net margin | 14.5% | 22.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 32.3% (better) | 24.7% |
| Return on equity | 28.7% (better) | 17.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.17 (better) | 0.73 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.22 | 2.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 (better) | 1.00 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | 31.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.5% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.6% | 85.3% |
| Held by insiders | 8.4% | 19.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.8M (better) | −$68.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- MRX stock overview
- MRX income statement
- MRX valuation and score
- NDAQ stock overview
- NDAQ income statement
- NDAQ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.