Millrose Properties vs Terreno Realty
MRP and TRNO side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRP and TRNO compare
Terreno Realty is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Millrose Properties ($7.3B against $4.3B).
On earnings, Millrose Properties is cheaper: it trades at 8.6× trailing earnings, against 20.0× for Terreno Realty.
Terreno Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 68.1% compared with 63.2% at Millrose Properties.
Both pay dividends: Millrose Properties yields 11.9% and Terreno Realty 3.2%.
Terreno Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Millrose Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRP | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | $7.3B |
| Share price | $25.87 | $66.95 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.6% | 9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −13.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.82 |
| Employees | – | 47 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.6× (better) | 20.0× |
| P/S | 5.4× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.39 |
| Fair value | $43.52 | $61.58 |
| Margin of safety | 40.6% (better) | −8.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 17.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 20.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 161% (better) | 10.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 27.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 85.2% | – |
| Net margin | 63.2% | 68.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.6% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 4.2× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.83 | 3.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 11.9% (better) | 3.2% |
| Payout ratio | 99.7% | 62.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | −6.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.9% (better) | −2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.5% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 14.5% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $6.8M (better) | −$1.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.5% | 5.7% |
Go deeper
- MRP stock overview
- MRP income statement
- MRP valuation and score
- TRNO stock overview
- TRNO income statement
- TRNO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.