Everspin Technologies vs SUNation Energy
MRAM and SUNE side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRAM and SUNE compare
Everspin Technologies is the larger company, worth 23 times as much as SUNation Energy ($298M against $12.7M).
Everspin Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.7% versus 10.3% for SUNation Energy).
SUNation Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.5% compared with −14.3% at Everspin Technologies.
Everspin Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for SUNation Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRAM | SUNE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $298M | $12.7M |
| Share price | $12.25 | $1.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.3% | 39.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.41% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.71 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 85 | 164 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 4.3× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | 0.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | −2.2% | – |
| Fair value | $9.84 | $18.39 |
| Margin of safety | −24.5% | 89.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.7% (better) | 10.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 54.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.2% (better) | 35.7% |
| Operating margin | −23.3% | −7.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −14.3% | −8.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −9.3% | – |
| Return on equity | −14.8% (better) | −24.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −53.1% | −17.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.13 |
| Interest coverage | – | −8.1× |
| Current ratio | 3.31 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.49 (better) | −0.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 52.4% | 18.3% |
| Held by insiders | 7.3% | 11.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.8M | $1.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.5% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- MRAM stock overview
- MRAM income statement
- MRAM valuation and score
- SUNE stock overview
- SUNE income statement
- SUNE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.