Marqeta vs Navan
MQ and NAVN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MQ and NAVN compare
Navan is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Marqeta ($6.6B against $1.9B).
Navan grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.8% versus 22.4% for Marqeta).
Marqeta keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.5% compared with −42.1% at Navan.
Marqeta scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Navan), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MQ | NAVN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $6.6B |
| Share price | $18.23 | $25.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.4% | 40.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.51 |
| Employees | 938 | 3,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 182× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 8.0× |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 57.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.6× (better) | 145× |
| FCF yield | 10.4% (better) | 0.69% |
| Fair value | $11.07 | $12.13 |
| Margin of safety | −64.6% (better) | −109% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.4% | 34.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.0% | 72.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.9% (better) | −25.7% |
| Net margin | 1.5% (better) | −42.1% |
| FCF margin | 29.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| Return on equity | 1.3% (better) | −540% |
| Return on invested capital | −65.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −8.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.66 | 4.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.72 | 7.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 11.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 11.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.7% | 64.6% |
| Held by insiders | 13.4% | 55.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3M | $4.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- MQ stock overview
- MQ income statement
- MQ valuation and score
- NAVN stock overview
- NAVN income statement
- NAVN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.