Mosaic vs CVR Partners, LP
MOS and UAN side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MOS and UAN compare
Mosaic is the larger company, worth 6.1 times as much as CVR Partners, LP ($7.2B against $1.2B).
CVR Partners, LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 0.02% for Mosaic).
CVR Partners, LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.7% compared with −9.4% at Mosaic.
Both pay dividends: Mosaic yields 3.9% and CVR Partners, LP 9.3%.
CVR Partners, LP scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Mosaic), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MOS | UAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $22.80 | $112.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.9% | 16.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.1% | 37.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.51 |
| Employees | 13K | 320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.4× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 0.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.3× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 8.3× |
| FCF yield | −11.2% | 12.1% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $244.74 |
| Margin of safety | – | 53.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.02% | 17.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −191% | 82.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −191% | 82.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.58% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.4% | 33.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −5.1% | 28.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.4% | 23.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −6.8% | 21.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −2.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.12 | 1.57 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | 3.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.62 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% | 9.3% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 34.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% | 9.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.4% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.31% | 78.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$509K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.8% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- MOS stock overview
- MOS income statement
- MOS valuation and score
- UAN stock overview
- UAN income statement
- UAN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.