Mosaic vs Nutrien
MOS and NTR side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MOS and NTR compare
Mosaic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 3.5% for Nutrien).
Nutrien keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with −5.2% at Mosaic.
Mosaic pays a dividend yielding 4.8%; Nutrien does not pay one.
Mosaic scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Nutrien), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MOS | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | – |
| Share price | $18.39 | $69.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.8% | 23.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.8% | 3.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.47 |
| Employees | 13K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | – |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.7× | – |
| FCF yield | −16.2% | – |
| Fair value | $24.68 | – |
| Margin of safety | 25.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | 3.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −168% | 236% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −168% | 243% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.58% | 41.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.0% | 31.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 13.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.2% | 8.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.7% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.3% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.85% | 8.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 0.42 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.61 | 1.64 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.34 (better) | 1.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.58 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 46.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 34.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.4% | 56.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.31% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$491K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- MOS stock overview
- MOS income statement
- MOS valuation and score
- NTR stock overview
- NTR income statement
- NTR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.