Modine Manufacturing vs Patrick Industries
MOD and PATK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MOD and PATK compare
Modine Manufacturing is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Patrick Industries ($5.5B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Patrick Industries is cheaper: it trades at 20.6× trailing earnings, against 43.3× for Modine Manufacturing.
Modine Manufacturing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.1% versus 1.7% for Patrick Industries).
Modine Manufacturing keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with 3.4% at Patrick Industries.
Patrick Industries pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Modine Manufacturing does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MOD | PATK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $103.07 | $79.47 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.1% | −24.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 769% | 49.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.73 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 13K | 7,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.3× | 20.6× (better) |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 9.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 12.6× |
| FCF yield | −0.18% | 8.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $72.57 | $71.23 |
| Margin of safety | −42.0% | −11.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.3% | 10.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −31.2% | 10.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.7% | 23.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 10.1% (better) | 6.3% |
| Net margin | 3.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| FCF margin | −0.27% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.4% | 11.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.4% (better) | 7.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.59 (better) | 1.21 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.28 (better) | 3.24 |
| Interest coverage | 11.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 2.51 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.18 (better) | 2.87 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 46.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.2% | 4.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 6.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.3% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.4M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 17.1% |
Go deeper
- MOD stock overview
- MOD income statement
- MOD valuation and score
- PATK stock overview
- PATK income statement
- PATK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.