Mobilicom vs ParaZero Technologies
MOB and PRZO side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MOB and PRZO compare
ParaZero Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.3% versus 5.8% for Mobilicom).
ParaZero Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −517% compared with −705% at Mobilicom.
ParaZero Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Mobilicom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MOB | PRZO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.32 | $0.488 |
| Change, 1 year | −64.8% | −64.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 2.18 |
| Employees | 38 | 22 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% | 12.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −68.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Operating margin | – | −721% |
| Net margin | −705% | −517% (better) |
| FCF margin | −57.7% (better) | −557% |
| Return on equity | – | −97.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 10.77 (better) | 5.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.9% | 7.1% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$14.8K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- MOB stock overview
- MOB income statement
- MOB valuation and score
- PRZO stock overview
- PRZO income statement
- PRZO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.