Mach Natural Resources LP vs Northern Oil & Gas
MNR and NOG side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MNR and NOG compare
Northern Oil & Gas is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Mach Natural Resources LP ($2.7B against $1.5B).
Mach Natural Resources LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.7% versus −28.3% for Northern Oil & Gas).
Mach Natural Resources LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −27.5% at Northern Oil & Gas.
Both pay dividends: Mach Natural Resources LP yields 19.9% and Northern Oil & Gas 7.2%.
Mach Natural Resources LP scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Northern Oil & Gas), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MNR | NOG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $9.03 | $25.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.6% | 14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −37.2% | 20.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.21 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 840 | 64 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2× | – |
| Fair value | $15.88 | $27.42 |
| Margin of safety | 43.1% (better) | 8.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.7% (better) | −28.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 35.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 37.7% (better) | −359% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.3% (better) | −376% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 69.5% |
| Operating margin | 17.9% (better) | −24.2% |
| Net margin | 10.5% (better) | −27.5% |
| Return on equity | – | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −16.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.82 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | −2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.79 (better) | 0.59 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 19.9% (better) | 7.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | −5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 19.9% (better) | 1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.5% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 64.9% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.3M | $1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.79% | 19.1% |
Go deeper
- MNR stock overview
- MNR income statement
- MNR valuation and score
- NOG stock overview
- NOG income statement
- NOG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.