Maximus vs TIC Solutions
MMS and TIC side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MMS and TIC compare
Maximus is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as TIC Solutions ($3.4B against $2.3B).
Maximus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.1% compared with −5.1% at TIC Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Maximus yields 2.0% and TIC Solutions 96.8%.
Maximus scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 6 for TIC Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MMS | TIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $2.3B |
| Share price | $64.71 | $10.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.7% | −0.65% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 37K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× (better) | 16.3× |
| P/FCF | 7.8× (better) | 67.7× |
| PEG | 0.51 | – |
| FCF yield | 12.8% (better) | 1.5% |
| Fair value | $132.50 | $12.92 |
| Margin of safety | 51.2% (better) | 17.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.3% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 17.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.6% | 34.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.0% (better) | −0.98% |
| Net margin | 7.1% (better) | −5.1% |
| FCF margin | 8.3% (better) | 1.5% |
| Return on equity | 21.1% (better) | −5.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.2% (better) | −0.50% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.94 | 0.76 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.51 (better) | 6.19 |
| Interest coverage | 6.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.42 (better) | 2.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.04 (better) | 1.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | 96.8% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 10.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.2% | 96.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 85.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 51.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$254K | $0 (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | – |
Go deeper
- MMS stock overview
- MMS income statement
- MMS valuation and score
- TIC stock overview
- TIC income statement
- TIC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.