Marcus & Millichap vs Offerpad Solutions
MMI and OPAD side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MMI and OPAD compare
Marcus & Millichap is the larger company, worth 109 times as much as Offerpad Solutions ($934M against $8.6M).
Marcus & Millichap grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus −44.3% for Offerpad Solutions).
Marcus & Millichap keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −11.3% at Offerpad Solutions.
Marcus & Millichap pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; Offerpad Solutions does not pay one.
Marcus & Millichap scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Offerpad Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MMI | OPAD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $934M | $8.6M |
| Share price | $24.66 | $1.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | −91.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −47.4% | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 2.29 |
| Employees | 854 | 140 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 63.2× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 14.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.1% (better) | −1267% |
| Fair value | $11.48 | $14.95 |
| Margin of safety | −115% | 88.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.0% (better) | −44.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.0% (better) | −11.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 1.3% (better) | −9.7% |
| Net margin | 1.8% (better) | −11.3% |
| FCF margin | 8.0% (better) | −31.1% |
| Return on equity | 2.6% (better) | −117% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% (better) | −216% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | 17.2× (better) | −4.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.79 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.72 (better) | −1.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 135% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.4% | 34.4% |
| Held by insiders | 38.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$48.5K | $200K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | – |
Go deeper
- MMI stock overview
- MMI income statement
- MMI valuation and score
- OPAD stock overview
- OPAD income statement
- OPAD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.