MillerKnoll vs Interface
MLKN and TILE side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MLKN and TILE compare
Interface is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as MillerKnoll ($1.8B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Interface is cheaper: it trades at 13.4× trailing earnings, against 15.5× for MillerKnoll.
Interface grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus 1.2% for MillerKnoll).
Interface keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 2.6% at MillerKnoll.
Both pay dividends: MillerKnoll yields 3.4% and Interface 0.35%.
Interface scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 16 for MillerKnoll), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MLKN | TILE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Share price | $21.84 | $31.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 54.9% | 21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.0% | 99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 11K | 3,570 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | 13.0× (better) | 13.6× |
| PEG | 0.46 | 0.17 (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.7% (better) | 7.4% |
| Fair value | $28.31 | $35.00 |
| Margin of safety | 22.9% (better) | 9.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% (better) | 4.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 22.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% | 40.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 9.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 9.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.4% | 20.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | 20.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 | 0.18 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 | 0.21 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | 14.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.65 | 2.30 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | 4.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.35% |
| Payout ratio | 52.3% | 4.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% (better) | −8.8% |
| Buyback yield | −0.55% | 1.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$7.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 6.1% |
Go deeper
- MLKN stock overview
- MLKN income statement
- MLKN valuation and score
- TILE stock overview
- TILE income statement
- TILE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.