Mueller Industries vs Quanex Building Products
MLI and NX side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MLI and NX compare
Mueller Industries is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Quanex Building Products ($12.1B against $947M).
On earnings, Mueller Industries is cheaper: it trades at 14.2× trailing earnings, against 20.9× for Quanex Building Products.
Mueller Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 1.3% for Quanex Building Products).
Mueller Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.2% compared with 2.4% at Quanex Building Products.
Both pay dividends: Mueller Industries yields 1.2% and Quanex Building Products 1.5%.
Mueller Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for Quanex Building Products), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MLI | NX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.1B | $947M |
| Share price | $54.56 | $20.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.2% | 42.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 287% | −8.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 4,832 | 7,071 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.2× (better) | 20.9× |
| P/S | 2.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 3.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4× | 7.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.1× | 10.4× (better) |
| PEG | 2.52 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | 9.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $54.07 | $23.39 |
| Margin of safety | −0.90% | 11.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 40.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.8% (better) | 26.6% |
| Operating margin | 23.0% (better) | 6.0% |
| Net margin | 18.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% (better) | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 26.3% (better) | 6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 40.3% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.24 | 2.87 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5352× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 4.78 (better) | 2.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 14.53 (better) | 1.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 1.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.4% | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 38.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.63% (better) | 0.51% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.8% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.5% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 11.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$45.1M | −$3.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- MLI stock overview
- MLI income statement
- MLI valuation and score
- NX stock overview
- NX income statement
- NX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.