StockData

MarketAxess vs UP Fintech

MKTX and TIGR side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MKTX and TIGR compare

UP Fintech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.3% versus 3.9% for MarketAxess).

MarketAxess pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; UP Fintech does not pay one.

MarketAxess scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for UP Fintech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMKTXTIGR
Size and price
Market cap$5.8B–
Share price$165.31$4.02
Change, 1 year−2.3%−62.1%
Change, 5 years−54.1%−38.3%
Beta (5Y)0.621.69
Employees868244
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score2 (better)0
Valuation
P/E20.2×–
P/S6.7×–
P/B4.6×–
EV/EBITDA13.2×–
P/FCF16.5×–
FCF yield6.1%–
Fair value$194.08–
Margin of safety14.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.9%56.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.2%34.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)33.0%–
EPS growth (TTM)38.9%158% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average−3.3%44.0% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin39.1%–
Net margin33.5%–
FCF margin40.4%214% (better)
Return on equity22.0%–
Return on invested capital30.3%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.07–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.69–
Interest coverage47.6×–
Current ratio–1.12
Altman Z-score5.44–
Piotroski F-score6–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.3%–
Years of dividend growth12–
Dividend growth, 5Y average4.8%–
Buyback yield5.2%–
Shareholder yield7.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions111%2.1%
Held by insiders2.5%19.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.2M−$42.9K (better)
Short interest, % of float11.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.