Mitek Systems vs Planet Image International
MITK and YIBO side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MITK and YIBO compare
Mitek Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus 3.6% for Planet Image International).
Mitek Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.4% compared with −5.3% at Planet Image International.
Mitek Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for Planet Image International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MITK | YIBO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $846M | – |
| Share price | $18.74 | $1.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 101% | −8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.16 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 595 | 1,615 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.9× | – |
| P/S | 4.3× | – |
| P/B | 3.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.4× | – |
| PEG | 1.19 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | – |
| Fair value | $17.12 | – |
| Margin of safety | −9.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.1% (better) | 3.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 45.3% (better) | −216% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 42.4% (better) | −208% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 29.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.8% (better) | −7.3% |
| Net margin | 11.4% (better) | −5.3% |
| FCF margin | 24.6% (better) | −2.1% |
| Return on equity | 9.2% (better) | −14.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | −25.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 | 0.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.37 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.74 (better) | 1.68 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.43 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.5% | 0.23% |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 59.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.5M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | 0.10% |
Go deeper
- MITK stock overview
- MITK income statement
- MITK valuation and score
- YIBO stock overview
- YIBO income statement
- YIBO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.