StockData

Mitek Systems vs Stratasys

MITK and SSYS side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MITK and SSYS compare

Mitek Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus −3.1% for Stratasys).

Mitek Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Stratasys), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMITKSSYS
Size and price
Market cap$846M–
Share price$18.74$6.54
Change, 1 year101%−31.9%
Change, 5 years4.1%−78.0%
Beta (5Y)1.161.33
Employees5951,757
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E39.9×–
P/S4.3×–
P/B3.4×–
EV/EBITDA21.7×–
P/FCF17.4×–
PEG1.19–
FCF yield5.7%–
Fair value$17.12–
Margin of safety−9.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.1% (better)−3.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.1% (better)1.1%
Net income growth (TTM)45.3%–
EPS growth (TTM)42.4%–
EPS growth, 5Y average1.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin–40.4%
Operating margin17.8% (better)−15.3%
Net margin11.4%–
FCF margin24.6% (better)−4.2%
Return on equity9.2%–
Return on invested capital18.6% (better)−8.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.20 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−1.37–
Interest coverage4.9×–
Current ratio2.743.48 (better)
Altman Z-score5.43–
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.5%–
Shareholder yield2.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions85.5%48.2%
Held by insiders4.7%15.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.5M–
Short interest, % of float10.0%4.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.