MIND Technology vs MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES
MIND and MITQ side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIND and MITQ compare
MIND Technology is the larger company, worth 5.8 times as much as MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES ($28.6M against $5.0M).
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.6% versus −28.5% for MIND Technology).
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.7% compared with −6.8% at MIND Technology.
MOVING iMAGE TECHNOLOGIES scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for MIND Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIND | MITQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.6M | $5.0M |
| Share price | $3.15 | $0.500 |
| Change, 1 year | −77.1% | −35.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.0% | −79.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 157 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× (better) | 1.1× |
| FCF yield | −13.5% (better) | −50.6% |
| Fair value | $8.02 | $1.95 |
| Margin of safety | 60.7% | 74.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.5% | −4.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% | 19.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −155% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −108% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.2% (better) | 29.1% |
| Operating margin | −2.7% (better) | −2.9% |
| Net margin | −6.8% | −1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −11.1% (better) | −14.5% |
| Return on equity | −6.8% | −6.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.2% (better) | −141% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 6.92 (better) | 2.27 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.03 | 1.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.12% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.12% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.3% | 5.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 0.51% |
Go deeper
- MIND stock overview
- MIND income statement
- MIND valuation and score
- MITQ stock overview
- MITQ income statement
- MITQ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.