Magnum Ice Cream vs Post
MICC and POST side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MICC and POST compare
Post grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus −0.47% for Magnum Ice Cream).
Magnum Ice Cream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with 3.5% at Post.
Post scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Magnum Ice Cream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MICC | POST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.6B |
| Share price | $19.87 | $81.65 |
| Change, 1 year | – | −23.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −22.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.36 |
| Employees | 17K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.1× |
| P/S | – | 0.4× |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 6.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 15.4% |
| Fair value | – | $156.58 |
| Margin of safety | – | 47.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.47% | 6.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 11.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.4% | −20.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 253% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.6% (better) | 28.8% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.7% (better) | 3.5% |
| FCF margin | 1.6% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.0% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 25.0% (better) | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.48 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.34 |
| Interest coverage | 5.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.01 | 1.85 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 28.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 33.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 33.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.9% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 19.9% | 15.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$34.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- MICC stock overview
- MICC income statement
- MICC valuation and score
- POST stock overview
- POST income statement
- POST valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.