StockData

Magnum Ice Cream vs Nomad Foods

MICC and NOMD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MICC and NOMD compare

Magnum Ice Cream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.47% versus −3.4% for Nomad Foods).

Nomad Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with 3.7% at Magnum Ice Cream.

Magnum Ice Cream scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Nomad Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMICCNOMD
Size and price
Share price$19.87$12.03
Change, 1 year–5.2%
Change, 5 years–−52.8%
Beta (5Y)–0.35
Employees17K7,752
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.47% (better)−3.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−49.4%−41.2% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–−4.4%
Profitability
Gross margin34.6% (better)26.9%
Operating margin7.6%10.4% (better)
Net margin3.7%4.2% (better)
FCF margin1.6%8.5% (better)
Return on equity15.0% (better)4.9%
Return on invested capital25.0% (better)6.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.92
Net debt / EBITDA–5.52
Interest coverage5.1× (better)1.6×
Current ratio1.011.10 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio28.3%67.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions47.9%61.4%
Held by insiders19.9%20.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$10.1M
Superinvestors holding3–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.