Miami International vs Oppenheimer
MIAX and OPY side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MIAX and OPY compare
Miami International is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Oppenheimer ($3.3B against $923M).
On earnings, Oppenheimer is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 38.7× for Miami International.
Miami International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.8% versus 13.9% for Oppenheimer).
Miami International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.7% compared with 4.9% at Oppenheimer.
Oppenheimer pays a dividend yielding 0.88%; Miami International does not pay one.
Oppenheimer scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Miami International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MIAX | OPY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $923M |
| Share price | $33.63 | $86.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.1% | 25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 62.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 439 | 2,947 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 38.7× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | 7.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.3× (better) | 16.1× |
| PEG | – | 0.16 |
| FCF yield | 7.5% (better) | 6.2% |
| Fair value | $21.53 | $114.09 |
| Margin of safety | −56.2% | 24.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.8% (better) | 13.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7832% (better) | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −0.94% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 7.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 7.9% (better) | 7.2% |
| Net margin | 9.7% (better) | 4.9% |
| FCF margin | 17.1% (better) | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% (better) | 9.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.6% (better) | 9.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −4.41 | – |
| Interest coverage | 31.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.61 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 5.75 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.88% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −13.4% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.25% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 1.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.6% | 41.7% |
| Held by insiders | 23.2% | 6.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$79.3M | −$420K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.6% | 0.98% |
Go deeper
- MIAX stock overview
- MIAX income statement
- MIAX valuation and score
- OPY stock overview
- OPY income statement
- OPY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.