McGraw Hill vs WEBTOON Entertainment
MH and WBTN side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MH and WBTN compare
McGraw Hill is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as WEBTOON Entertainment ($2.2B against $1.3B).
McGraw Hill grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.70% versus −3.7% for WEBTOON Entertainment).
McGraw Hill keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with −25.2% at WEBTOON Entertainment.
WEBTOON Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for McGraw Hill), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MH | WBTN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Share price | $11.60 | $9.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −17.7% | −41.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 1.46 |
| Employees | 4,400 | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.5× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.5% (better) | −0.93% |
| Fair value | $14.09 | $13.04 |
| Margin of safety | 17.6% | 24.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.70% (better) | −3.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 81.7% (better) | 25.4% |
| Operating margin | 13.4% (better) | −3.4% |
| Net margin | 3.5% (better) | −25.2% |
| FCF margin | 12.3% (better) | −0.92% |
| Return on equity | 8.8% (better) | −25.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.8% (better) | −4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.88 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.57 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −447.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.86 | 2.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.49 | 2.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −2.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 41.0% |
| Held by insiders | 87.1% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.6% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- MH stock overview
- MH income statement
- MH valuation and score
- WBTN stock overview
- WBTN income statement
- WBTN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.