StockData

McGraw Hill vs Thomson Reuters

MH and TRI side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MH and TRI compare

Thomson Reuters grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus 0.14% for McGraw Hill).

Thomson Reuters keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.1% compared with 4.4% at McGraw Hill.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMHTRI
Size and price
Market cap$2.6B–
Share price$13.34$118.25
Change, 1 year19.1%−23.8%
Change, 5 years–−1.4%
Beta (5Y)0.070.58
Employees4,400–
StockData Score
Total score55
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score22
Health score01 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E26.7×–
P/S1.2×–
P/B3.2×–
EV/EBITDA7.6×–
P/FCF7.6×–
FCF yield13.2%–
Fair value$15.44–
Margin of safety13.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.14%3.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–4.6%
Net income growth (TTM)–−32.0%
EPS growth (TTM)–−31.9%
EPS growth, 5Y average–8.2%
Profitability
Gross margin81.7%–
Operating margin13.9%28.5% (better)
Net margin4.4%20.1% (better)
FCF margin15.9%27.0% (better)
Return on equity17.3%–
Return on invested capital9.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity3.27–
Net debt / EBITDA3.651.11 (better)
Current ratio0.78 (better)0.51
Altman Z-score0.54–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%89.5%
Held by insiders87.1%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.3M–
Short interest, % of float11.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.