StockData

McGraw Hill vs Pearson

MH and PSO side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MH and PSO compare

Pearson grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.70% versus 0.14% for McGraw Hill).

Pearson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 4.4% at McGraw Hill.

Pearson scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for McGraw Hill), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMHPSO
Size and price
Market cap$2.6B–
Share price$13.34$17.37
Change, 1 year19.1%22.2%
Change, 5 years–113%
Beta (5Y)0.070.37
Employees4,4004,722
StockData Score
Total score58 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score24 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E26.7×–
P/S1.2×–
P/B3.2×–
EV/EBITDA7.6×–
P/FCF7.6×–
FCF yield13.2%–
Fair value$15.44–
Margin of safety13.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.14%0.70% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–1.0%
Net income growth (TTM)–−22.8%
EPS growth (TTM)–−20.2%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−59.0%
Profitability
Gross margin81.7% (better)52.0%
Operating margin13.9%14.2% (better)
Net margin4.4%9.4% (better)
FCF margin15.9%–
Return on equity17.3% (better)8.7%
Return on invested capital9.2% (better)7.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.270.41 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA3.652.26 (better)
Interest coverage–5.2×
Current ratio0.78–
Altman Z-score0.54–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–47.8%
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%4.2%
Held by insiders87.1%31.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.3M–
Short interest, % of float11.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.