Magnolia Oil & Gas vs Northern Oil & Gas
MGY and NOG side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGY and NOG compare
Magnolia Oil & Gas is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Northern Oil & Gas ($5.8B against $2.7B).
Magnolia Oil & Gas grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.3% versus −28.3% for Northern Oil & Gas).
Magnolia Oil & Gas keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.8% compared with −27.5% at Northern Oil & Gas.
Both pay dividends: Magnolia Oil & Gas yields 2.1% and Northern Oil & Gas 7.2%.
Magnolia Oil & Gas scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Northern Oil & Gas), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGY | NOG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $24.54 | $25.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.9% | 14.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.2% | 20.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 262 | 64 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× | – |
| P/S | 3.5× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× | – |
| Fair value | $24.10 | $27.42 |
| Margin of safety | −1.8% | 8.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.3% (better) | −28.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.4% | 35.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | −359% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.6% (better) | −376% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 69.5% |
| Operating margin | 36.9% (better) | −24.2% |
| Net margin | 25.8% (better) | −27.5% |
| Return on equity | – | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −16.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.73 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.51 | 0.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 (better) | 0.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 7.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 30.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −5.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.7% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.92% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.5M | $1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.3% | 19.1% |
Go deeper
- MGY stock overview
- MGY income statement
- MGY valuation and score
- NOG stock overview
- NOG income statement
- NOG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.