StockData

MacroGenics vs Arcus Biosciences

MGNX and RCUS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MGNX and RCUS compare

Arcus Biosciences is the larger company, worth 16 times as much as MacroGenics ($2.2B against $140M).

MacroGenics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.6% versus −58.3% for Arcus Biosciences).

MacroGenics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −33.2% compared with −453% at Arcus Biosciences.

MacroGenics scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Arcus Biosciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMGNXRCUS
Size and price
Market cap$140M$2.2B
Share price$2.20$17.43
Change, 1 year49.7%−12.8%
Change, 5 years−88.1%−63.3%
Beta (5Y)1.711.42
Employees293601
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9× (better)22.2×
P/B5.6× (better)6.2×
FCF yield−29.5%−21.0% (better)
Fair value–$5.80
Margin of safety–−201%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)67.6% (better)−58.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.3%25.9% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin−41.5% (better)−475%
Net margin−33.2% (better)−453%
FCF margin−26.7% (better)−466%
Return on equity−112% (better)−114%
Financial health
Interest coverage−3.6× (better)−43.2×
Current ratio2.753.34 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.82−1.35 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)1
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−12.6%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−12.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions76.4%96.3%
Held by insiders6.2%31.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$129K (better)−$9.3M
Short interest, % of float8.3%15.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.