MacroGenics vs Precigen
MGNX and PGEN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGNX and PGEN compare
Precigen is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as MacroGenics ($1.6B against $140M).
Precigen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with −33.2% at MacroGenics.
Precigen scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for MacroGenics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGNX | PGEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $140M | $1.6B |
| Share price | $2.20 | $4.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 49.7% | 12.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.1% | 20.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.71 | 1.63 |
| Employees | 293 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 114× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/B | 5.6× (better) | 19.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 43.8× |
| FCF yield | −29.5% | −4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $1.34 |
| Margin of safety | – | −239% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 67.6% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | −21.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −41.5% | 21.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −33.2% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −26.7% (better) | −47.4% |
| Return on equity | −112% | 38.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 147% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.12 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.14 |
| Interest coverage | −3.6× | 2.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.75 | 5.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −4.82 (better) | −5.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.4% | 39.2% |
| Held by insiders | 6.2% | 44.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$129K (better) | −$32.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | 22.8% |
Go deeper
- MGNX stock overview
- MGNX income statement
- MGNX valuation and score
- PGEN stock overview
- PGEN income statement
- PGEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.