Magnite vs ZipRecruiter
MGNI and ZIP side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGNI and ZIP compare
Magnite is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as ZipRecruiter ($4.2B against $487M).
On earnings, ZipRecruiter is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 25.4× for Magnite.
Magnite grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 3.0% for ZipRecruiter).
Magnite keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.6% compared with 9.3% at ZipRecruiter.
Magnite scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for ZipRecruiter), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGNI | ZIP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.2B | $487M |
| Share price | $29.21 | $5.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 101% | 32.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.2% | −81.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.30 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 971 | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.4× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 5.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.0× | 19.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.4× | 14.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.7% | 7.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $30.75 | $9.74 |
| Margin of safety | 5.0% | 39.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 26.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 212% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 219% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.6% | 89.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 18.4% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net margin | 23.6% (better) | 9.3% |
| FCF margin | 31.3% (better) | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | 20.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.7% | 22.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.22 | 2.54 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.04 | 3.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 | 2.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.9% | 4.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 63.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 49.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.9M | −$2.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- MGNI stock overview
- MGNI income statement
- MGNI valuation and score
- ZIP stock overview
- ZIP income statement
- ZIP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.