StockData

Mistras vs Stantec

MG and STN side by side, both in engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MG and STN compare

Stantec grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus 4.6% for Mistras).

Mistras scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Stantec), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMGSTN
Size and price
Market cap$643M–
Share price$20.18$75.50
Change, 1 year54.4%−29.4%
Change, 5 years128%32.2%
Beta (5Y)0.680.73
Employees4,800–
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score4 (better)3
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E32.0×–
P/S0.9×–
P/B2.6×–
EV/EBITDA12.0×–
P/FCF19.1×–
PEG0.89–
FCF yield5.2%–
Fair value$16.15–
Margin of safety−25.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.6%8.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.1%11.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)14.8%–
EPS growth (TTM)10.5%32.5% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–22.4%
Profitability
Gross margin28.7%–
Operating margin6.1%–
Net margin2.8%–
FCF margin4.5%–
Return on equity8.8%–
Return on invested capital7.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.700.56 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA2.33–
Interest coverage3.2×–
Current ratio1.74 (better)1.23
Altman Z-score2.86–
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions62.4%62.0%
Held by insiders68.2%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$61.7K–
Short interest, % of float6.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.