StockData

mF International vs Perpetuals.com

MFI and PDC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MFI and PDC compare

mF International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.7% versus −41.8% for Perpetuals.com).

mF International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 233% compared with −1070% at Perpetuals.com.

mF International scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Perpetuals.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMFIPDC
Size and price
Share price$6.20$2.16
Change, 1 year−75.1%−50.4%
Change, 5 years−91.4%–
Beta (5Y)2.880.94
Employees104
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)29.7% (better)−41.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.5%
Profitability
Gross margin29.6%59.5% (better)
Operating margin−144% (better)−1073%
Net margin233% (better)−1070%
FCF margin−47.4%–
Return on equity8.3% (better)−75.8%
Return on invested capital−6.4% (better)−61.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Interest coverage–−325.3×
Current ratio254.01 (better)0.12
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions–3.2%
Held by insiders18.4%30.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$32.5K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.