Ramaco Resources vs NACCO Industries
METC and NC side by side, both in energy. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How METC and NC compare
NACCO Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.54% versus −17.7% for Ramaco Resources).
NACCO Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with −12.0% at Ramaco Resources.
NACCO Industries pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Ramaco Resources does not pay one.
NACCO Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Ramaco Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | METC | NC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $266M |
| Share price | $7.24 | $35.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −70.9% | −22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.7% | 15.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 900 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.9× |
| P/S | – | 0.9× |
| P/B | – | 0.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.4× |
| Fair value | – | $33.85 |
| Margin of safety | – | −4.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −17.7% | 0.54% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 26.0% (better) | 16.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −48.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −49.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.5% | 18.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14.1% | 9.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.0% | 5.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −17.1% | 3.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −27.8% | 5.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.97 |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 4.23 (better) | 3.16 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 51.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.69% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.0% | 28.2% |
| Held by insiders | 17.3% | 31.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$66.1M | −$383K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- METC stock overview
- METC income statement
- METC valuation and score
- NC stock overview
- NC income statement
- NC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.