StockData

Mesoblast vs Regenxbio

MESO and RGNX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MESO and RGNX compare

Mesoblast grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (599% versus 12.0% for Regenxbio).

Mesoblast keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −47.8% compared with −113% at Regenxbio.

Mesoblast scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Regenxbio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMESORGNX
Size and price
Market cap–$504M
Share price$13.27$7.64
Change, 1 year−15.5%−34.1%
Change, 5 years6.3%−77.2%
Beta (5Y)1.501.78
Employees108371
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.9×
P/B–7.0×
FCF yield–−49.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)599% (better)12.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average74.5% (better)2.0%
Profitability
Gross margin86.1%–
Operating margin–−94.1%
Net margin−47.8% (better)−113%
FCF margin−37.1% (better)−143%
Return on equity–−138%
Financial health
Interest coverage–−3.9×
Current ratio2.432.86 (better)
Altman Z-score–−3.83
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.30%64.2%
Held by insiders37.3%7.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$37.5M (better)$9.6K
Short interest, % of float–16.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.