StockData

MDxHealth vs Exagen

MDXH and XGN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MDXH and XGN compare

MDxHealth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.8% versus 13.7% for Exagen).

Exagen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −25.1% compared with −31.1% at MDxHealth.

MDxHealth scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Exagen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMDXHXGN
Size and price
Market cap–$100M
Share price$0.144$4.13
Change, 1 year−96.5%−56.9%
Change, 5 years−98.6%−65.9%
Beta (5Y)0.971.18
Employees364220
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.4×
P/B–7.3×
FCF yield–−13.0%
Fair value–$3.60
Margin of safety–−14.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.8% (better)13.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average42.3% (better)9.7%
Profitability
Gross margin64.5% (better)58.7%
Operating margin−13.4% (better)−20.1%
Net margin−31.1%−25.1% (better)
FCF margin−3.1% (better)−18.0%
Return on equity–−114%
Return on invested capital–−167%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.66
Interest coverage−0.6× (better)−2.9×
Current ratio1.083.46 (better)
Altman Z-score–−5.71
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions32.3%34.1%
Held by insiders–29.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$991K (better)−$22.9K
Short interest, % of float–4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.