StockData

MiMedx vs AVITA Medical

MDXG and RCEL side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MDXG and RCEL compare

MiMedx and AVITA Medical are about the same size, with market caps of $473M and $501M.

AVITA Medical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus −22.8% for MiMedx).

MiMedx keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.3% compared with −42.7% at AVITA Medical.

MiMedx scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for AVITA Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMDXGRCEL
Size and price
Market cap$473M$501M
Share price$3.24$16.20
Change, 1 year−57.0%309%
Change, 5 years−58.1%8.1%
Beta (5Y)0.971.96
Employees808226
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.6× (better)5.9×
P/B2.2×–
FCF yield–−3.8%
Fair value$4.92–
Margin of safety34.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.8%17.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.0%67.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−147%–
EPS growth (TTM)−148%–
Profitability
Gross margin77.3%82.4% (better)
Operating margin−8.3% (better)−33.9%
Net margin−6.3% (better)−42.7%
FCF margin–−22.8%
Return on equity−8.5%–
Return on invested capital−19.3% (better)−276%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−5.1×
Current ratio4.35 (better)1.20
Altman Z-score6.39 (better)−9.18
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions79.9%15.9%
Held by insiders2.9%2.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0$235K (better)
Short interest, % of float6.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.