MDU Resources vs NorthWestern Energy
MDU and NWE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MDU and NWE compare
NorthWestern Energy is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as MDU Resources ($5.2B against $4.1B).
On earnings, MDU Resources is cheaper: it trades at 21.1× trailing earnings, against 32.0× for NorthWestern Energy.
NorthWestern Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus −0.72% for MDU Resources).
MDU Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.3% compared with 9.5% at NorthWestern Energy.
Both pay dividends: MDU Resources yields 2.9% and NorthWestern Energy 3.1%.
MDU Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for NorthWestern Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MDU | NWE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $5.2B |
| Share price | $19.59 | $84.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.5% | 26.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.2% | 55.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 2,096 | 1,667 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.1× (better) | 32.0× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.5× (better) | 15.4× |
| FCF yield | −7.8% | −3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.48 | $55.13 |
| Margin of safety | −6.0% (better) | −54.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.72% | 10.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.8% (better) | −24.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.0% (better) | −24.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −13.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.1% | 18.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.3% (better) | 9.5% |
| FCF margin | −17.2% | −11.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% (better) | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 (better) | 1.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.80 (better) | 6.34 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.88 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.07 (better) | 0.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 3.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 59.9% | 99.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −8.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | −4.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −1.2% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 95.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 0.92% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $104K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- MDU stock overview
- MDU income statement
- MDU valuation and score
- NWE stock overview
- NWE income statement
- NWE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.