MDU Resources vs National Fuel Gas
MDU and NFG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MDU and NFG compare
National Fuel Gas is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as MDU Resources ($7.3B against $4.1B).
On earnings, National Fuel Gas is cheaper: it trades at 10.7× trailing earnings, against 21.1× for MDU Resources.
National Fuel Gas grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.1% versus −0.72% for MDU Resources).
National Fuel Gas keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.9% compared with 10.3% at MDU Resources.
Both pay dividends: MDU Resources yields 2.9% and National Fuel Gas 2.8%.
National Fuel Gas scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for MDU Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MDU | NFG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $7.3B |
| Share price | $19.59 | $76.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.5% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.2% | 30.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 2,096 | 2,322 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.1× | 10.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 1.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.5× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 32.8× |
| FCF yield | −7.8% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.48 | $114.37 |
| Margin of safety | −6.0% | 32.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.72% | 15.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.8% | 177% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.0% | 169% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −13.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.1% | 40.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.3% | 26.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.2% | 8.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.80 | 1.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 6.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.88 | 3.20 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.07 | 1.68 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 59.9% | 29.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −8.3% | 3.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −4.1% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −1.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 83.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $104K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- MDU stock overview
- MDU income statement
- MDU valuation and score
- NFG stock overview
- NFG income statement
- NFG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.