StockData

Charming Medical vs Mangoceuticals

MCTA and MGRX side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MCTA and MGRX compare

Charming Medical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−22.7% versus −38.9% for Mangoceuticals).

Charming Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.47% compared with −4791% at Mangoceuticals.

Mangoceuticals scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Charming Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMCTAMGRX
Size and price
Market cap–$3.3M
Share price$29.35$0.155
Change, 1 year33.3%−91.2%
Beta (5Y)0.85−1.27
Employees29–
StockData Score
Total score37 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score11
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–10.6×
P/B–0.3×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.7% (better)−38.9%
Net income growth (TTM)−102%–
EPS growth (TTM)−100%–
Profitability
Gross margin99.3% (better)54.4%
Operating margin−0.61% (better)−3829%
Net margin−0.47% (better)−4791%
FCF margin−32.4%–
Return on equity−0.87% (better)−95.1%
Return on invested capital−13.7% (better)−60.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−1.9×–
Current ratio1.89 (better)0.18
Altman Z-score–−6.15
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.24%5.6%
Held by insiders71.9%57.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$21.2K
Short interest, % of float11.5%0.59%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.